C'est Albert Getabu qui donne la solution à l'énigme de Karen sur les loutres !
(Thanks Albert for giving explanation about Karen's enigma on outsmarting otters !)
Chers Lionel et Caren,
Merci pour ce thème très intéressant que vous avez lancé. Dans notre cas, ici, les
fermiers utilisent diverses méthodes qui ne sont pas toutes efficaces, mais faute de
mieux, ils n'ont pas d'autres options. Cela inclue l'utilisation de méthodes
d'effarouchement et la division des étangs avec des piquets en bois plantés fermement
dans le sol et placés suffisamment proches pour empêcher les loutres de pénétrer. Les
pieux sont assez espacés pour permettre aux poissons de circuler tout en empêchant les
loutres de faire de même. Ainsi, même si une loutre rentre dans une moitié d'étang,
les poissons s'en rendent compte et peuvent aller se réfugier dans la deuxième moitié.
Si la loutre sort de l'eau et pénètre dans l'autre moitié de l'étang, les
poissons font le chemin inverse. L'efficacité de la méthode dépend de la manière dont
les piquets sont disposés dans l'étang. Si cette méthode est relativement efficace
contre les loutres, en revanche, elle ne fonctionne pas contre les serpents, pas plus que
les méthodes d'effarouchement; donc nous allons devoir faire avec assez longtemps en
attendant que ce problème ne soit résolu.
Certaines volailles peuvent se nourrir de serpents, donc s'ils sont intégrés avec les
poissons, ils peuvent manger quelques serpents et grenouilles; L'intégration avec des
canards fait aussi fuir les oiseaux prédateurs et aide probablement à se débarrasser des
grenouilles, mais je ne sais pas s'il existe des données à ce propos ?
Donc, en fonction de ce que vous avez présenté, je pense que combiner le chien avec de la
volaille et de l'effarouchement pourrait constituer une bonne méthode de contrôle
non-létale des prédateurs dans les structures aquacoles.
Albert
Le 23 juil. 2010 à 12:04, Getabu Albert a écrit :
Dear Lionel and Caren,
Thanks for the very the inresreting topic you have introduced. In our case here, farmers
try various methods which are not fully effective but in absence of nothing else, they
have no other option. These involve the use of scare crows and the division of the pond
with wooden stakes driven firmly into the pond bottom and placed close together to rpevent
otters from entering the other half of the pond. The stakes are placed at a spacing that
cannot allow the otters through but can allow the fish. So if the otter enters one half of
the pond and is sensed by fish, they try to run away from it and cross the wooden stakes
into the other half . If the otter gets out and enters the other half of the pond, the
fish again cross the stakes to the other side where they were previously. The
effectivemess of the method depends on how the stakes are spaced in the pond. Whereas this
method could be effective to some extent against otters, it cannot control predatory
snakes, nor can they controlled by scarecrows; so still we have a long way to go to sort
out this problem.
Some types of poultry can feed on snakes, so if they are integrated with fish, then they
may be able to eat some snales and frogs. Integration with ducks in the ponds can also
scare away predatory birds and probably help get rid of frogs, but what data is there to
ascertain this?
From what you have presented, I think that combining the dog with poultry and scarecrows
can be a good non harmful method of controlling predators in aquaculture facilities.
Albert
--- On Fri, 7/23/10, Karen L. Veverica <veverkl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: Karen L. Veverica <veverkl(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [Sarnissa] non-lethal predator control
To: "sarnissa-african-aquaculture Mailing List"
<sarnissa-african-aquaculture(a)lists.stir.ac.uk>
Date: Friday, July 23, 2010, 1:25 AM
Dear Prof Lionel,
I see your two-part message only met with reply for the funding part. Well, I was about
to write something on credit for fish farmers because we have been working on this issue
for several years for Uganda and it is a major question and prospective component of some
new world bank projects in the works but your non-lethal control of predator question
caught my fancy.
For those of you new to this game, in short, know your predator and know how it thinks,
and its biology. Also note that some predators actually render service in removing
unhealthy fish. Otehrs get out of hand and remove the healthy fish and these are the ones
we try to target. As for predators, I suppose you are speaking of the otters, and the
worst birds which tend to be cormorants, and pelicans because they are such efficient
fishers. The others pick off a few fish but rarely fish in groups.
The recent advances on the big fish farms in the US, have been to purchase a very
well-trained dog; most often the breed of border collie. These can be rather expensive.
However, many fish farmers in Africa do train dogs to fight off birds and otters.
There was a rather ingenious development of a solar-powered alligator head that would
randomly re-position in a pond itself during the day, thereby making the birds think it
was a real animal. This was developed by researchers at Louisianan State University.
When I say alligator, it would be crocodile for Africa. There are also some inflatable
'gators that are used as children's toys in swimming pools. These work also but
anything that remains stationery only scares the birds for a while.
One of the most creative and clever means of controlling otters is the method that Randy
Brummet explained to me that was figured out by fish farmers in Malawi. It is not really
control; it is outsmarting the otters (hard to do) so they cannot eat as many fish. I will
let him explain it or if others in Malawi recall it, will let them.
The "bird wires" are often used across a pond as well. Some think that they
should be visible to keep birds from landing and others think they should be monofilament
so the birds try to land and then collide with the wires, thereby getting discouraged (and
embarrassed).
Hanging out one dead bird of the species that is causing the trouble is also a well-known
technique but you asked for non-lethal....
The imitations of owls, hanging out old CD's as reflectors, ribbon that makes noise,
air cannons that shoot off, all these are useful for about 2 weeks. After that the birds
get used to them and they fly up, around in circle and then land where they were. Bird
scaring devices should be changed every 2 weeks.
Well , this will maybe begin the conversation,
Cheers,
Karen
-- Karen L. Veverica
Auburn University Dept. of Fisheries and Allied Aquacultures, USA
office: +1-334-844-4667
cell: +1-334-332-1560
www.ag.auburn.edu/fish/international/
_______________________________________________
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture mailing list
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sarnissa-african-aquacultu…
_______________________________________________
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture mailing list
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sarnissa-african-aquacultu…
--
Visitez mon blog / Visit my blog :
http://aquaculture-notes.blogspot.com/
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL:
<http://lists.stir.ac.uk/pipermail/sarnissa-french-aquaculture/attachments/20100723/23d02bfc/attachment.htm>