Dear Johan, dear all,
The mails of Johan Theron and Christian Ducarme
(on the French Forum) about the necessity to use
adapted aquaculture species may initiate a most interesting debate:
Will aquaculture development be supported by a
large number of species adapted to local
environments or shall we see the development of a
limited number of species genetically selected
and adapted to different environments?
Indeed, the history of lifestock management and
selection (cattle, poultry, pig....) leaded to
the use of a limited number of species
individually selected for specific use. Will
aquaculture follow a different trend and be
supported by the use of a large number of local
species adapted to the local environments?
Cheers,
Pierre Morissens
At 14:37 05/11/2008, JOHAN THERON wrote:
Dear Lionel,
Humans determine what species to cultivate. We
do not say "What species is best for the farmer/
country", but "With O. niloticus you can make the most money".
In South Africa we have the same problem with O.
mossambicus, it grows too slowly. Slowly for
whom? Do you compare O. mossambicus in an
environment where the water temperature do not
exceed 24 deg C for more than 3 months of the
year, with the GIFT strain of O. niloticus,
which as far as I am aware, is the fastest
growing of all the Tilapias (species/ varieties/
strains within species)? And this in an
environment that has a water temperature of 28
deg C for 6 or more months per year?
Switching O. mossambicus with O. niloticus will
not make your fish grow faster, as both have the
same temperature requirement. You will just end
up with fertile crosses/ hybrids, as is already
happening in South Africa, with people illegally
smuggling in O. niloticus (most probably from
neighbouring Zimbabwe). See the (cellphone)
photo attached, the mossambicus bars on the
flank & the niloticus bars on the tail clearly
visible. These hybrids also do not really grow
any faster than their (pure) parents, as the
main problem remains the low water temperature
for the greater part of the year.
One should rather improve the growing capability
of the local species (as with the GIFT strain),
or you should turn to a species that is more
suitable for your own environment (Cyprinus
carpio, the common European carp) in the case of
South Africa. Alternatively, control the
environment. This means warm water
recirculating aquaculture systems, which can be
done by commercial farmers, but not subsistence/
small-scale farmers. Also, why do a low cost
fish like Tilapia in an expensive environment like a RAS?
Anyway, these are just some of my own thoughts/ observations after 25 years.
Regards,
Johan
Johan Theron
Aquaculture Research Unit
University of Limpopo
Private Bag X1106
Sovenga
0727
Limpopo Province
Republic of South Africa
Tel +27 (0) 15 268 2295
Fax +27 (0) 86 540 4811
Mobile +27 (0) 82 200 5279
johant(a)ul.ac.za
johantheron58(a)yahoo.com
"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield"
>> Lionel Dabbadie
<lionel.dabbadie(a)cirad.fr> 11/05/08 1:13 AM >>>
Bonjour à tous,
Ce message de C. Ducarme est resté sans
réponse, je me permets de le relancer et de
poster une traduction sur le forum anglophone.
J'essaierais de traduire en français les éventuelles réponses.
Dear all,
This question by C. Ducarme remained unanswered
and un-commented on the French forum until now.
If any comment arises from the English forum, I
will try to translate it into French... Please forgive my bad English ! Thanks
Lionel Dabbadie
Dear all,
I have a question for our scientists :
Why not make more applied and applicable (...)
research on species other than niloticus, which
must be accounting today for 90-95% of the world tilapia production?
- if we admit that optimal temperature for
growth (and feed conversion) of niloticus is +/- 28°C
- that below 24°C, its growth falls dramatically,
- that niloticus is (theoretically) absent from
many African water bodies and that introducing
it is a problem. Please note that there are
currently some discussion about it in South Africa
- that we must not forget that in intensive
farming, oxygenation efficiency is dependant on
temperature, so that a lower temperature is more efficient and more profitable
- that most projects I visit observe 1 to 5
months growth delay per year, with many consequences not understood by farmers
Why keeping on insisting in imposing this
species at the borders of its living areas,
instead of valorising native fauna ?
I have personally been very disappointed when
work on O. aureus was stopped, because this
species had many advantages, among which to be
less thermophilic and to have lower level of
spontaneous spawning, so that it came out more
profitable to be grown in our conditions. This
said, work by Maldeco was quite remarkable:
adapt, on their own funds, O. shiranus and O.
karongae for intensive fish farming in lake
Malawi. But many stake-holder less known work in
the shade on O. andersonii, mortimerii...
I really hope that we will soon see "GIFT"
projects developed on these species that will be
very useful in limit areas of our dear niloticus
Regards
Ducarme Chr.
Début du message réexpédié :
De : "ducarme chr"
<<mailto:chr.ducarme@skynet.be>chr.ducarme@skynet.be>
Date : 1 novembre 2008 15:41:30 HNEC
à :
<<mailto:sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk>sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk>
Objet : [Sarnissa-french-aquaculture] pourquoi le niloticus?
Répondre à :
<mailto:sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk>sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk
Chers tous,
Jâai une question à poser à nos scientifiques :
Pourquoi ne pas faire plus de recherche appliquée applicable (
) sur
dâautres espèces que le niloticus qui doit
aujourdâhui constituer 90-95 % de
la production mondiale de tilapia.
-Si nous admettons que la température optimale de croissance (et de
conversion alimentaire) du niloticus est +/- 28 °C
-Si en dessous de 24 °C on admet que les vitesses de croissance
sâeffondrent,
-Le niloticus étant absent (théoriquement) de nombreux bassins versants
africains, il est délicat de vouloir
lâintroduire, à ce sujet la république
dâAfrique du sud est en train de vouloir lâautoriser sur son territoire
-Nâoublions pas que en pisciculture intensive
lâefficacité de lâoxygénation
est fonction de la t° donc travailler à une
t° plus basse est plus efficace
et plus économique
-la plus part des projets que je visite ont des arrêts (retards) de
croissance 1, 2, 3, 4,5 mois par an avec toutes les conséquences non
comprises par le producteur.
Pourquoi donc sâacharner à lâimposer dans
des zones limites au détriment de
la faune locale ?
Jâai personnellement été déçus lâors de
lâabandon du travail sur lâO aureus
qui avait divers avantages, dont celui dâêtre moins thermophile et moins
prolifique et en finale plus économique à produire dans nos conditions.
Ceci étant le travail effectué par Maldeco est remarquable : adapter sur
leurs fonds propres lâO. shiranus et
lâO.karongae en pisciculture intensive
sur le lac Malawi,
Mais dâautres acteurs moins connus travaillent dans lâombre sur lâO
andersonii, mortimerii
Jâespère voir bientôt des projets « GIFT
» développés sur ces espèces qui
seront très utiles dans les zones limite rentables pour notre cher
niloticus.
Bien à vous
Ducarme Chr.
Bonne espérance N° 28
4500 Huy
Belgium
Tel. 00 32 85 233073
00 32 476 538874
Skype: christian.ducarme
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL:
<http://lists.stir.ac.uk/pipermail/sarnissa-french-aquaculture/attachments/20081101/b2530753/attachment.htm>http://lists.stir.ac.uk/pipermail/sarnissa-french-aquaculture/attachments/20081101/b2530753/attachment.htm
_______________________________________________
Sarnissa-french-aquaculture mailing list
<mailto:Sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk>Sarnissa-french-aquaculture@lists.stir.ac.uk
http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sarnissa-french-aquaculture
_______________________________________________
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture mailing list
Sarnissa-african-aquaculture(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sarnissa-african-aquacultu…
-------------- section suivante --------------
Une pièce jointe HTML a été nettoyée...
URL: