[Media-watch] Norm Solomon - PU litzer prizes for 2004

[David McKnight]

Norman Solomon: 'The P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2004'
Posted on Saturday, December 11 @ 08:36:42 EST 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
By Norman Solomon, AlterNet

The P.U.-litzer Prizes were established a dozen years ago to provide
special recognition for truly smelly media performances. As usual, I've
conferred with Jeff Cohen, founder of the media watch group FAIR, to sift
through the large volume of entries.

And now, the 13th Annual P.U.-litzer Prizes, for the foulest media
performances of 2004:

MANDATE MANIA: Too many winners to name

It became a media mantra. Two days after the election, the Los Angeles
Times reported that "Bush can claim a solid mandate of 51 percent of the
vote." Cox columnist Tom Teepen referred to Bush's vote margin as an
"unquestionable mandate." 



Right-wing pundit Bill Kristol argued that Bush's "mandate" went beyond the
49-states-to-one landslides of Nixon in 1972 and Reagan in 1984. Reality
check: This was the narrowest win for an incumbent president since 1916. As
Greg Mitchell wrote in Editor & Publisher: "Where I come from, 51 percent
is considered a bare majority, not a comfortable margin. If only 51 percent
of my family or my editorial staff think I am doing a good job, I might
look to moderate my behavior, not repeat or enlarge it."

MEDIA BIGOT OF THE YEAR: MSNBC and radio host Don Imus

On his Nov. 12 show, the day after Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat died,
Imus said of Palestinians: "They're eating dirt and that fat pig wife of
his is living in Paris." After an Imus colleague referred to Palestinians
as "stinking animals" and said "they ought to drop the bomb right there,
kill 'em all right now," Imus responded: "Well, the problem is we have (NBC
reporter) Andrea (Mitchell) there; we don't want anything to happen to
her." In February, when a civilian Iranian airliner crashed, killing 43
people, Imus reacted: "When I hear stories like that, I think 'Who cares?'"
So much for showing the Islamic world we don't see all Muslims as enemies.

NO APOLOGY FOR BEING GULLIBLE AWARD: CBS anchor Dan Rather

Asked at a Harvard forum in July what network TV news could have done
better during the build-up to the Iraq war, Dan Rather said "more questions
should have been asked" and then declared: "Look, when a president of the
United States, any president, Republican or Democrat, says these are the
facts, there is heavy prejudice, including my own, to give him the benefit
of any doubt, and for that I do not apologize."

TIMIDITY RULES PRIZE: The Washington Post columnist David Ignatius

Explaining why mainstream journalism failed to ask tough questions about
the Iraq war before it started, columnist Ignatius - a war supporter -
wrote in April: "In a sense, journalists were victims of their own
professionalism. Because there was little criticism of the war from
prominent Democrats and foreign policy analysts, journalistic rules meant
we shouldn't create a debate on our own." Create a debate? Ignatius
suggests it would have been unprofessional to raise questions at a time
that many experts, over a hundred Congress members and millions of others
were already questioning the drive to war.

"ONLY RIGHT-WING POLITICS THIS ELECTION YEAR" AWARD: Disney's Michael Eisner

In May, when Disney refused to distribute Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11"
documentary, CEO Michael Eisner said that Disney "didn't want to be in the
middle of a politically-oriented film during an election year." But Disney
was one of the 2004 election year's leading broadcasters of political
propaganda, almost all of it pro-Bush, as its powerful talk radio stations
served up hour after hour of right-wing hosts like Rush Limbaugh, Sean
Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Laura Ingraham, Matt Drudge, etc.

MEDIA MOGULS FOR BUSH PRIZE: Viacom CEO Sumner Redstone

Seven weeks before the election, Sumner Redstone expressed support for Bush
on behalf of his company, which owns CBS, UPN, MTV, VH1, Infinity radio and
dozens of other subsidiaries: "From a Viacom standpoint, the election of a
Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican
administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so
on." Days later, Redstone added: "I vote for Viacom. Viacom is my life, and
I do believe that a Republican administration is better for media companies
than a Democratic one." (Ironically, cultural conservatives often blame TV
and radio sleaze on "The Liberal Media" - not GOP-backing media owners like
Redstone and Rupert Murdoch.)

MOUTHPIECE FOR POWER AWARD: The Washington Post

Give credit for candor to Karen DeYoung, former assistant managing editor,
for this comment in an August report examining why the Washington Post
marginalized prewar doubts about White House claims on Iraqi weapons of
mass destruction: "We are inevitably the mouthpiece for whatever
administration is in power. If the president stands up and says something,
we report what the president said." If counter-arguments are put "in the
eighth paragraph, where they're not on the front page, a lot of people
don't read that far."

STENOGRAPHIC PRIDE AWARD: Judith Miller, The New York Times

Defending her use of anonymous sources like Ahmed Chalabi, a highly
unreliable Iraqi exile, in prewar front-page stories on Iraq's supposed
WMDs, reporter Miller explained: "My job isn't to assess the government's
information and be an independent intelligence agency myself. My job is to
tell readers of The New York Times what the government thought about Iraq's
arsenal." Miller did not explain how her job differs from being a PR agent
for the U.S. government.

WINNING HEARTS AND LUNGS AWARD: Thomas Friedman, The New York Times

In a Nov. 18 column datelined "Camp Fallujah, Iraq," columnist Friedman
summed up the situation after the U.S. assault had left much of Fallujah in
rubble: "Bottom line? Iraq is a country still on life support, and U.S.
troops are the artificial lungs and heart." Apparently, the U.S. military
needed to deprive the country of oxygen and blood in order to save it.

ORWELLIAN FORCES AWARD: Nic Robertson and others

U.S. military spokespersons now describe those who attack U.S. soldiers in
Iraq as "anti-Iraqi forces" - even though, by all documented accounts, the
vast majority of those forces are actually Iraqis. And some American
journalists have begun to make that newspeak their own, among them CNN's
senior international correspondent Robertson. On Nov. 25, Robertson
reported from "Camp Freedom in Mosul, where the troops go out in their
Striker vehicles into the city of Mosul." He continued: "What they are
doing has been conducting offensive operations to disrupt the anti-Iraqi
forces."

OUTFOXING FOX PRIZE: Jack Cafferty, CNN

As co-anchor of CNN's morning program, Cafferty had something to report on
March 31: "It's a red-letter day here in America," he said. "Air America,
that communist radio network, starts broadcasting in a little while."
Cafferty was unyielding when CNN colleague Soledad O'Brien responded by
saying that the new talk-radio network was not communist but liberal. He
replied: "Well. Aren't they synonymous?"

Norman Solomon is co-author of "Target Iraq: What the News Media Didn't
Tell You."

© 2004 Independent Media Institute.

Reprinted from AlterNet:
http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/20714/ 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.stir.ac.uk/pipermail/media-watch/attachments/20041212/03183733/attachment.htm