Sorry Till and sorry all
I cannot make it to the lab this afternoon - meetings here in Dublin
All the best
Maev
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 11:26, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk>
wrote:
Dear PhD Lab,
Just a quick reminder that we will have our first summer PhD lab today at
14:30-16:00
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmZjOGJiMDctYzA3Ni00…
<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZmZjOGJiMDctYzA3Ni00Y2EyLWE3ZTItODUwOGMwYjkzMzNh%40thread.v2/0?context=%7B%22Tid%22%3a%224e8d09f7-cc79-4ccb-9149-a4238dd17422%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22687c6002-ec0f-42f0-87a8-916e90b3c5b2%22%7D>
Also, please have a look at Leo’s e-mail and survey draft (see below)
before the lab, so you are able to give feedback on it.
Thanks and see you later today!
Till
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Leonhard Lades <l.k.lades(a)stir.ac.uk>
*Subject: **Re: [Phd-behsci] PhD Lab meetings over the summer*
*Date: *8 July 2024 at 09:57:52 BST
*To: *Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk>uk>, phd-behsci Mailing List
<phd-behsci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk>
*Cc: *Lucie Martin <lucie.martin(a)esri.ie>ie>, Cara Augustenborg <
cara.augustenborg(a)ucd.ie>gt;, Margaret Samahita <margaret.samahita(a)ucd.ie>ie>,
Niamh Whelan <niamh.whelan1(a)ucdconnect.ie>ie>, Patricia Lentz <
patricia.lentz(a)ucd.ie>
Hi all,
Looking forward to seeing you on Wednesday in the Lab session!
From around 4pm on Wednesday, I will be talking about a survey we are
going to put into the field in the next few weeks. It is a simple but
innovative survey about "Sludge" (~ frictions that make it harder for us to
do what we want; the opposite of nudge).
Many people in Behavioural Public Policy talk about the unequal effects of
sludge, but so far nobody has quantified such inequalities using a survey.
A Word version of the survey is attached, and a short summary of the idea
is below. I will only talk for 5 minutes or so to have enough time for your
thoughts.
We'd be grateful for any feedback! Potential feedback relates to the
sludge vignettes and ideas for new sludge vignettes (the DVs), the
independent variables, whether we should present the data on vulnerability
and acceptability in the same paper, what not to forget when
pre-registering... And is anybody aware of simple survey measures for
scarcity (time/money/energy), present bias, unrealistic optimism, limited
attention?
Thanks in advance for your feedback and all the best,
Leo
The key idea of the survey is to present people with about 10 short
descriptions such as:
*"To apply for financial assistance from the government, you must fill out
a lengthy form, providing lots of information that is already on government
systems."*
and then follow up with questions on vulnerability to sludge (e.g. would
it be difficult for you to carry out this task?) as well as acceptability
of sludge (e.g. Is this procedure acceptable?).
Then we test whether "vulnerability" and "acceptability" differ
depending
on (maybe a subset of) age, gender, education, employment status, ethnic
group, marital status, living rural or urban, income, a measure of
scarcity, physical health, mental health, having a disability, personality
traits, trust in government, and left/right political leaning.
Here is a list of the sludge descriptions we have so far come up with. The
below only shows sludge when interacting with government services. However,
participants will randomly see sludge from either the public or the private
sector so we can see differences there.
- *"To access a government service, you must first set up an online
account. This involves providing contact information and agreeing to be
contacted."*
- *"To access information from a government website, you must register
and log into an account. The website frequently experiences service
shut-downs so you are unable to access messages or updates."*
- *"To submit an application for a government grant, you cannot upload
a pdf document. Instead you must manually fill out the details in mandatory
boxes"*
- *"To apply for financial assistance from the government, you must
fill out a lengthy form, providing lots of information that is already on
government systems."*
- *"To apply for a rebate from the government, you must make a phone
call and wait on hold for long periods before connecting with a staff
member"*
- *"To access a government service, you must organise an in-person
meeting. The time slots are limited and difficult to obtain"*
- "To choose a provider for a government service, you must search for
the relevant information on various websites. The details are fragmented
and presented in different formats, making comparison difficult."
- "To choose the best option for a service from the government, you
must compare various details, which are often presented in a lengthy and
complicated way"
- *"To unsubscribe from a government mailing list, you must visit the
website and fill out a 7 question survey providing reasons for leaving"*
- *"To unsubscribe from a government mailing list, you must visit the
website and find the unsubscribe button that is often purposely hard to
find"*
- *"To access information on a government website, you frequently
encounter pop-up advertisements that block the webpage. This makes it
difficult and time-consuming to view the relevant information"*
- *"To switch pension plans you must first post a form to the
government authorities detailing the request. This leads to delays for
processing the update"*
- *"To obtain a public licence, you must hire an advisor, a process
that can be time-consuming and often comes with additional fees."*
- *"To contact support for public services, you must first select a
button on an automated menu before being referred to the relevant phone
line"*
- *"To apply for assistance from the government, you must compile
detailed financial history, employment documents, and references. The
approval process can take weeks, often requiring resubmissions due to
unclear requirements and conflicting advice online"*
- *"To access government services online, you often encounter broken
or outdated links, making it difficult to find the necessary information."*
- *"To apply for a government permit, you often have to wait for
extended periods without receiving progress updates. This lack of
communication leads to frustration and uncertainty"*
- *"To register for government support, you must provide multiple
forms of identification, often without a clear reason."*
- *"To access government services online, you often find websites
incompatible with screen readers. This creates barriers for visually
impaired users, making it hard to get necessary information and services."*
- *"To access certain government services, you must disclose sensitive
information, which can expose you to stigma"*
The quite simple analysis will be along these lines:
(1) Are some people more vulnerable to sludge than others? (OLS with
random effects or clustered standard errors as we have up to 10 sludge
vignettes per person.
- Vulnerability = b_0 + b_1 *Demographics* + b_2 *Personality* + b_3
SludgeType + epsilon
(2) Is sludge seen as more acceptable by some than by others? (OLS with
random effects or clustered standard errors)
- Acceptability = b_0 + b_1 *Demographics* + b_2 *Personality* + b_3
SludgeType + epsilon
- Acceptability = b_0 + b_1 PrivateOrPublic + b_2 *Demographics* + b_3
*Personality* + epsilon
------------------------------
*From:* PhD-BehSci <phd-behsci-bounces(a)lists.stir.ac.uk> on behalf of
Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk>
*Sent:* 04 July 2024 20:05
*To:* phd-behsci Mailing List <phd-behsci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk>
*Subject:* Re: [Phd-behsci] PhD Lab meetings over the summer
Hi all,
Thank you to those who have answered the doodle poll. We have a clear
winner: 10th of July.
So these are our PhD lab sessions during the Summer
Meeting 1: Wednesday, 10th of July, 14:30–16:00
- Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
- Agenda Item 2: Any takers for presentation? (no pressure if not)
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July, 11:00–12:30
- Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
- Agenda Item 2: Any takers for presentation? (no pressure if not)
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August, 11:00–12:30
- Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
- Agenda Item 2: Katie will present her progress
I will send through invites via Teams in a minute.
Best,
Till
On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:58, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear PhD Lab,
I’d like to revisit our three PhD labs over the Summer. We have already
found dates for Meetings 2 and 3 but we had to postpone Meeting 1 to TBD
because of a clash with the Summer School that Hector is hosting.
Meeting 1: Wednesday, XXth of July
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August
I would suggest to move the first meeting to next week (on MSTeams). I
have availabilities on Tuesday to Friday that week. To find the date that
best fits most of us, I have created the following doodle:
https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/eZmjYGgd
I’d be grateful if you could fill it in the doodle.
Best wishes,
Till
On 7 Jun 2024, at 14:50, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk> wrote:
Follow-up 3rd of July won’t work as this collides with Hector’s SGPE
Summer School (sorry, Hector, for this oversight).
We will have to move to the week before or after. @Simon: When are you
back from leave?
I will let you know an alternative suggestion soonish. Can't commit quite
yet as I am waiting for another event around that time to be confirmed.
Best,
Till
On 7 Jun 2024, at 14:00, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear PhD lab,
Apologies, I meant to send this through a lot sooner.
Shall we settle on a few dates to meet during the summer? I believe
monthly meetings (on Teams) would make sense. That would give us three
meetings until the beginning of the Autumn term.
Let’s have our first meeting once Simon is back from leave.
How about the following?
Meeting 1: Wednesday, 3rd of July
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August
@Katie: Which one of these would you like to present in?
I will also schedule 1:1 meetings with all Stirling-based PhD students in
June. Please let me know your availability.
Best,
Till
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC
011159
--
PhD-BehSci mailing list
PhD-BehSci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.stir…
<http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/phd-behsci>
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC
011159
--
PhD-BehSci mailing list
PhD-BehSci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.stir…
<http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/phd-behsci>
------------------------------
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC
011159
------------------------------
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC
011159
--
PhD-BehSci mailing list
PhD-BehSci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
http://lists.stir.ac.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/phd-behsci