Hi everyone,
I have been a bit quiet lately forgive me. I need to take some time out as my auntie who
was super close to me passed away over the weekend.
I will hopefully be checking in with all of you soon. Please do keep me in the loop.
Best.,
Jules
Julion Gallagher (Ruwette)
UK phone: +44 7367 641900
Ireland phone: +353 896153625
________________________________
From: PhD-BehSci <phd-behsci-bounces(a)lists.stir.ac.uk> on behalf of Leonhard Lades
<l.k.lades(a)stir.ac.uk>
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 10:57:52 AM
To: Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk>uk>; phd-behsci Mailing List
<phd-behsci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk>
Cc: Lucie Martin <lucie.martin(a)esri.ie>ie>; Patricia Lentz
<patricia.lentz(a)ucd.ie>ie>; Cara Augustenborg <cara.augustenborg(a)ucd.ie>ie>; Niamh
Whelan <niamh.whelan1(a)ucdconnect.ie>ie>; Margaret Samahita
<margaret.samahita(a)ucd.ie>
Subject: Re: [Phd-behsci] PhD Lab meetings over the summer
Hi all,
Looking forward to seeing you on Wednesday in the Lab session!
From around 4pm on Wednesday, I will be talking about a
survey we are going to put into the field in the next few weeks. It is a simple but
innovative survey about "Sludge" (~ frictions that make it harder for us to do
what we want; the opposite of nudge).
Many people in Behavioural Public Policy talk about the unequal effects of sludge, but so
far nobody has quantified such inequalities using a survey.
A Word version of the survey is attached, and a short summary of the idea is below. I will
only talk for 5 minutes or so to have enough time for your thoughts.
We'd be grateful for any feedback! Potential feedback relates to the sludge vignettes
and ideas for new sludge vignettes (the DVs), the independent variables, whether we should
present the data on vulnerability and acceptability in the same paper, what not to forget
when pre-registering... And is anybody aware of simple survey measures for scarcity
(time/money/energy), present bias, unrealistic optimism, limited attention?
Thanks in advance for your feedback and all the best,
Leo
The key idea of the survey is to present people with about 10 short descriptions such as:
"To apply for financial assistance from the government, you must fill out a lengthy
form, providing lots of information that is already on government systems."
and then follow up with questions on vulnerability to sludge (e.g. would it be difficult
for you to carry out this task?) as well as acceptability of sludge (e.g. Is this
procedure acceptable?).
Then we test whether "vulnerability" and "acceptability" differ
depending on (maybe a subset of) age, gender, education, employment status, ethnic group,
marital status, living rural or urban, income, a measure of scarcity, physical health,
mental health, having a disability, personality traits, trust in government, and
left/right political leaning.
Here is a list of the sludge descriptions we have so far come up with. The below only
shows sludge when interacting with government services. However, participants will
randomly see sludge from either the public or the private sector so we can see differences
there.
*
"To access a government service, you must first set up an online account. This
involves providing contact information and agreeing to be contacted."
*
"To access information from a government website, you must register and log into an
account. The website frequently experiences service shut-downs so you are unable to access
messages or updates."
*
"To submit an application for a government grant, you cannot upload a pdf document.
Instead you must manually fill out the details in mandatory boxes"
*
"To apply for financial assistance from the government, you must fill out a lengthy
form, providing lots of information that is already on government systems."
*
"To apply for a rebate from the government, you must make a phone call and wait on
hold for long periods before connecting with a staff member"
*
"To access a government service, you must organise an in-person meeting. The time
slots are limited and difficult to obtain"
*
"To choose a provider for a government service, you must search for the relevant
information on various websites. The details are fragmented and presented in different
formats, making comparison difficult."
*
"To choose the best option for a service from the government, you must compare
various details, which are often presented in a lengthy and complicated way"
*
"To unsubscribe from a government mailing list, you must visit the website and fill
out a 7 question survey providing reasons for leaving"
*
"To unsubscribe from a government mailing list, you must visit the website and find
the unsubscribe button that is often purposely hard to find"
*
"To access information on a government website, you frequently encounter pop-up
advertisements that block the webpage. This makes it difficult and time-consuming to view
the relevant information"
*
"To switch pension plans you must first post a form to the government authorities
detailing the request. This leads to delays for processing the update"
*
"To obtain a public licence, you must hire an advisor, a process that can be
time-consuming and often comes with additional fees."
*
"To contact support for public services, you must first select a button on an
automated menu before being referred to the relevant phone line"
*
"To apply for assistance from the government, you must compile detailed financial
history, employment documents, and references. The approval process can take weeks, often
requiring resubmissions due to unclear requirements and conflicting advice online"
*
"To access government services online, you often encounter broken or outdated links,
making it difficult to find the necessary information."
*
"To apply for a government permit, you often have to wait for extended periods
without receiving progress updates. This lack of communication leads to frustration and
uncertainty"
*
"To register for government support, you must provide multiple forms of
identification, often without a clear reason."
*
"To access government services online, you often find websites incompatible with
screen readers. This creates barriers for visually impaired users, making it hard to get
necessary information and services."
*
"To access certain government services, you must disclose sensitive information,
which can expose you to stigma"
The quite simple analysis will be along these lines:
(1) Are some people more vulnerable to sludge than others? (OLS with random effects or
clustered standard errors as we have up to 10 sludge vignettes per person.
*
Vulnerability = b_0 + b_1 Demographics + b_2 Personality + b_3 SludgeType + epsilon
(2) Is sludge seen as more acceptable by some than by others? (OLS with random effects or
clustered standard errors)
*
Acceptability = b_0 + b_1 Demographics + b_2 Personality + b_3 SludgeType + epsilon
*
Acceptability = b_0 + b_1 PrivateOrPublic + b_2 Demographics + b_3 Personality + epsilon
________________________________
From: PhD-BehSci <phd-behsci-bounces(a)lists.stir.ac.uk> on behalf of Till Stowasser
<till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk>
Sent: 04 July 2024 20:05
To: phd-behsci Mailing List <phd-behsci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [Phd-behsci] PhD Lab meetings over the summer
Hi all,
Thank you to those who have answered the doodle poll. We have a clear winner: 10th of
July.
So these are our PhD lab sessions during the Summer
Meeting 1: Wednesday, 10th of July, 14:30–16:00
* Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
* Agenda Item 2: Any takers for presentation? (no pressure if not)
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July, 11:00–12:30
* Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
* Agenda Item 2: Any takers for presentation? (no pressure if not)
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August, 11:00–12:30
* Agenda Item 1: General Catch Up
* Agenda Item 2: Katie will present her progress
I will send through invites via Teams in a minute.
Best,
Till
On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:58, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear PhD Lab,
I’d like to revisit our three PhD labs over the Summer. We have already found dates for
Meetings 2 and 3 but we had to postpone Meeting 1 to TBD because of a clash with the
Summer School that Hector is hosting.
Meeting 1: Wednesday, XXth of July
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August
I would suggest to move the first meeting to next week (on MSTeams). I have availabilities
on Tuesday to Friday that week. To find the date that best fits most of us, I have created
the following doodle:
https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/eZmjYGgd
I’d be grateful if you could fill it in the doodle.
Best wishes,
Till
On 7 Jun 2024, at 14:50, Till Stowasser <till.stowasser(a)stir.ac.uk> wrote:
Follow-up 3rd of July won’t work as this collides with Hector’s SGPE Summer School (sorry,
Hector, for this oversight).
We will have to move to the week before or after. @Simon: When are you back from leave?
I will let you know an alternative suggestion soonish. Can't commit quite yet as I am
waiting for another event around that time to be confirmed.
Best,
Till
On 7 Jun 2024, at 14:00, Till Stowasser
<till.stowasser@stir.ac.uk<mailto:till.stowasser@stir.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear PhD lab,
Apologies, I meant to send this through a lot sooner.
Shall we settle on a few dates to meet during the summer? I believe monthly meetings (on
Teams) would make sense. That would give us three meetings until the beginning of the
Autumn term.
Let’s have our first meeting once Simon is back from leave.
How about the following?
Meeting 1: Wednesday, 3rd of July
Meeting 2: Wednesday, 31st of July
Meeting 3: Wednesday, 28th of August
@Katie: Which one of these would you like to present in?
I will also schedule 1:1 meetings with all Stirling-based PhD students in June. Please let
me know your availability.
Best,
Till
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159
--
PhD-BehSci mailing list
PhD-BehSci(a)lists.stir.ac.uk
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.stir…
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159
--
PhD-BehSci mailing list
PhD-BehSci@lists.stir.ac.uk<mailto:PhD-BehSci@lists.stir.ac.uk>
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.stir…
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159