Dear all,
Just a reminder about our seminar today at 4pm. Jade Hooper (University of Stirling) will
be talking about dog-related injuries and their relation to social factors. Please, see
below the title and short abstract for her talk.
This meeting will take place in the Psychology Common Room.
Exploring Social and Locality Variations of Dog Bites in Scotland Using Administrative
Data Sources
Jade Hooper (Speaker); Prof. Paul Lambert; Prof. Hannah Buchanan-Smith; Dr. Tony
Robertson
Background
Previous research has shown that hospital admissions for dog-bites are highest in the most
deprived areas across England and Wales. In Scotland, thus far there has been no rigorous
empirical investigation into social inequalities in dog-related injuries. This study aims
to address this gap through analysis of linked administrative health data from NHS24
calls, A&E and SMR01 records involving dog-related injuries linked to Scotland Census
micro-data. Area-based measures of social circumstance are considered through the SIMD,
along with an exploration of novel, area-level characteristics including measures of local
greenspace, average garden size and dog populations. Individual/household level measures
of social circumstance taken from the Scottish Census are used to compare the
characteristics of individuals with health records involving dog-related injuries to a
random sample of individuals not appearing in the health data sets.
Results
When looking at individual level records and during modelling at aggregate area level,
SIMD was an important factor in all models. Whilst some variation was observed across the
different types of health data, the number of records, incident risk ratios and odds
ratios were all consistently at least 2-3 higher when comparing the most to least deprived
areas. Accounting for dog populations and introducing interaction terms for SIMD decile by
dog population increased the main effect of SIMD. When comparing individual/household
level measures of social circumstance taken from the Scottish Census, occupation-based
measures such as NS-SEC and CAMSIS appeared to be relatively important predictors of risk,
alongside household composition and age, with children disproportionately represented.
Conclusion
Incident rates of dog-related injuries were higher in more deprived areas and
circumstances where individuals may be seen as more socially disadvantaged at the
individual or household level. Social/legal policies related to dog-bites typically don’t
consider social disadvantage in any meaningful way. These results show the importance of
doing so.
Best,
Gema
________________________________
Scotland’s University for Sporting Excellence
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, number SC 011159