[Media-watch] Britain accused over CIA's secret torture flights - Independent - 10/02/2005

[Julie-ann Davies]

FWD

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/story.jsp?story=609538


Britain accused over CIA's secret torture flights
UK airports are believed to be operational bases for two executive jets used 
by the CIA to carry out 'renditions' of terror suspects. Report by Stephen 
Grey and Andrew Buncombe
10 February 2005


Britain's intelligence agencies have been accused of helping America in a 
secret operation that is sending terror suspects to Middle Eastern countries 
where prisoners are routinely tortured and abused.

Since 11 September 2001, the CIA has been systematically seizing suspects 
and sending them, without legal process, not only to Guantanamo Bay but to 
authorities in countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Human rights 
campaigners say the system, officially known as "extraordinary rendition" is 
a system of torture by proxy.

Britain maintains the main reason it will not deport prisoners being held 
without charge at Belmarsh prison is the fear they will be tortured or 
otherwise abused by their home country. But a series of cases has emerged 
which, critics say, exposes the Government's dishonesty by suggesting 
information provided by Britain about its citizens and residents has led to 
the capture and eventual torture of Islamic terrorist suspects.

Britain is also an operational base for two executive jets regularly used by 
the CIA to carry out so-called "renditions". One Gulfstream jet - used for 
taking prisoners to Egypt and Jordan from countries including Sweden and 
Indonesia - has called regularly at Luton, Glasgow, Prestwick and Northolt 
airports.

A Boeing 737 jet, used for the transfer of prisoners, passed through Glasgow 
airport on Monday morning on its way to Iraq. Both jets are white and 
unmarked, apart from their US civilian registration. Inquiries suggest they 
are owned by US companies that exist only on paper and which are almost 
certainly a front for the CIA.

Michael Ratner, the director of the Centre for Constitutional Rights, which 
is representing several former prisoners who were "renditioned", said: "It 
is a secret process. No one really knows what happens in the rendition 
process or in the gulag of secret CIA hellholes [where some prisoners are 
sent]."

One notorious rendition occurred in Sweden in December 2001 when a team of 
masked US agents arrived to transfer two Egyptian dissidents, both accused 
of terrorist involvement, to Cairo. Both complained later of torture.

But there is evidence that intelligence originating in Britain may have been 
behind the CIA's involvement in the seizure of at least one of the 
Egyptians, an asylum-seeker named Mohamed al-Zery, who, after months of 
torture, was eventually cleared and freed.

Yassir al-Sirri, an Islamic activist living in London who is accused by 
Egypt and America of having al-Qa'ida connections, said that, in the weeks 
before his own arrest in London in October 2001, he had been in touch with 
Mr Zery, who wanted help with collecting information for his asylum claim.

Speaking to BBC Radio's File on Four, Mr Sirri said that when British 
anti-terrorist officers raided his home, they took his computer and his fax 
records and those were passed to the Americans.

"Later in Sweden this man, Mr Zehry, was arrested and this information could 
only have come from the British authorities. They are completely 
responsible. It's criminal," Mr Sirri said.

Mr Sirri discovered later that, in the following weeks, many of his contacts 
around the world were seized. Mr Sirri, who runs an Islamic media centre 
devoted to exposing any human rights abuses, had contacts with many families 
of prisoners.

Mr Sirri had been arrested over accusations he was involved in the murder of 
the Afghan leader, Ahmed Shah Massood, but he was cleared when a UK judge 
described him as an "innocent fall guy". Efforts by both the US and Egypt to 
extradite him for alleged links to terrorism have failed.

In Stockholm, Kjell Jonsson, Mr Zehry's lawyer, said he also believed that 
information passed by Britain was the only explanation for his client's 
arrest and the involvement of American agents.

The practice of sending suspects abroad for coercive interrogation gathered 
pace after 11 September 2001, when a senior counter-terrorism officer, Cofer 
Black, openly admitted that after the al-Qa'ida attacks "the gloves came 
off'.

The procedure was supported by legal memos drafted by the White House 
Counsel, Alberto Gonzales, which claimed the Bush administration was not 
restricted by the Geneva Conventions when dealing with suspects from the 
so-called war on terror.

Michael Scheuer, a former senior CIA official involved in setting up the 
system, said: "The practice of capturing people and taking them to second or 
third countries arose because the Executive assigned the job of dismantling 
terrorist cells to the CIA.

"When the agency came back and said 'where do you want to take them?' The 
message was - 'that's your job'."

Mr Scheuer claims there was legal oversight in every renditioning case and 
yet he admitted suspects were tortured.

"The bottom line is, getting anyone off the street who you are confident has 
been involved, or is planning to be involved, in operations that could kill 
Americans is a worthwhile activity."

Just how many suspects have been subjected to renditioning is unclear.

Critics point out that the US does not permit suspects access to lawyers. 
They liken the secrecy to that which is surrounding the network of secret 
detention centres operated by the CIA around the world in places such as 
Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay, on US ships and on any number of 
locations that have not been publicly disclosed.

But the planes used by the CIA have left a trail. The Gulfstream, then 
registered as N379P, was first spotted landing at Shannon airport, Ireland, 
in spring 2003. Its registration number, since changed, was logged by 
members of a peace camp. They only learnt that it was the rendition plane 
when they were later contacted by Swedish journalists investigating the 
torture of the two Egyptians. "It just looked like a civilian plane," said 
Edward Horgan, 59, from Limerick, one of the witnesses to its landing.

American journalists have revealed the plane is formally owned by Bayard 
Foreign Marketing, which lists its headquarters as the address of a lawyer 
in Portland, Oregon. There is no evidence that Thomas Bayard, whose 
signature appears on documents filed with the local authorities, is a real 
person. When The Independent called the firm, there was nobody there, just 
an answering machine.

The allegations that Britain is co-operating with the "rendition" system are 
also bolstered by arrests in Gambia, west Africa, where four British 
residents were arrested and questioned by US agents in November 2002, 
apparently after a tip-off from British authorities.

Wahab al Rawi, an engineer whose family fled persecution in Iraq, was 
surprised to be questioned in Gambia by US agents when he had already been 
interviewed and freed by Britain's security service, MI5, back in London.

They had been asking him about his family's friendship with Abu Qatada, a 
radical Islamic cleric now in detention at Belmarsh prison. When Mr Rawi 
asked to see the British high commissioner, he said he was told: "Who do you 
think ordered your arrest?"

Though Mr Rawi was released, his brother Bisher and a business partner, 
Jamil al-Banaa, were picked up by the Americans, apparently in the 
Gulfstream. They are still being held in Guantanamo Bay.

Another case pointing to Britain's involvement is the arrest of Martin 
Mubanga in Zambia. Last weekend, after being freed from Guantanamo Bay, he 
alleged his original arrest came after the involvement, and accusations made 
against him, of an MI6 officer.

Craig Murray, the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan, has also accused 
Britain of complicity in torture, because of the use that MI6 makes of the 
intelligence gathered in this way by CIA.

He said many prisoners of Uzbek origin captured by American forces were 
taken back to Uzbek jails where they suffered the most brutal torture. 
Information obtained from these interrogations ended up in MI6 reports that 
he received. "I was told by the Foreign Office's senior legal adviser that 
there was nothing in law to prevent us obtaining and using material which 
had been extracted under torture provided that we had not ourselves done the 
torture," he said. "And MI6 said they found the intelligence useful. I was 
shattered and disillusioned."

A Foreign Office spokesman said Britain condemned torture but could not 
ignore intelligence from sources. "Without the sharing of intelligence, 
there would have been many more bloody terrorist attacks that would have 
gone ahead, like the plan to bomb a Christmas market in Strasbourg.

"If you have an agreement to work together against terrorism with another 
country then it's obvious common sense that one has to have a certain amount 
of trust in that country and in the way it chooses to use that 
intelligence."