[Media-watch] Journalist framed Rumsfeld armour question - CNN -
10/12/2004
Julie-ann Davies
jadavies2004 at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Dec 10 20:30:39 GMT 2004
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/10/chattanooga.paper.ap/index.html
Friday, December 10, 2004 Posted: 12:17 PM EST (1717 GMT)
Editor: Disclosure was needed on armor query
CHATTANOOGA, Tennessee (AP) -- A newspaper should have told its readers
promptly that an embedded reporter had helped frame a question that a
serviceman asked of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld this week in Kuwait,
the publisher says.
The question to Rumsfeld from Spc. Thomas "Jerry" Wilson, 31, of Nashville,
Tennessee complaining that many military vehicles in Iraq are not adequately
armored, has touched off a storm of new publicity about the issue.
"In hindsight, information on how the question was framed should have been
included in Thursday's story in the Times Free Press. It was not," the
paper's publisher and executive editor, Tom Griscom, said in a note to
readers published Friday.
Military affairs reporter Edward Lee Pitts, who is embedded with the 278th
Regimental Combat Team, said he worked with guardsmen after being told
reporters would not be allowed to ask Rumsfeld any questions.
Griscom said Pitts "used the tools available to him as a journalist to
report on a story that has been and remains important to members
of the 278th and those back at home."
Pitts had sent an e-mail to co-workers back in Tennessee on Wednesday
outlining his role.
"I was told yesterday that only soldiers could ask questions so I brought
two of them along with me as my escorts," he wrote. "Before hand we worked
on questions to ask Rumsfeld about the appalling lack of armor their
vehicles going into combat have."
He also said he went to the officer running the question and answer session
"and made sure he knew to get my guys out of the crowd."
But the story by Pitts published Thursday about the question to Rumsfeld
made no mention of Pitts' own role.
The question from Wilson appeared to surprise Rumsfeld on Wednesday and
prompted cheers among the soldiers listening to him in a hangar.
"Why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap
metal and compromised ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles?" Wilson had
said.
Rumsfeld said the Army was prodding manufacturers of vehicle armor to
produce it quickly, but added, "You go to war with the Army you have, not
the Army you might want or wish to have."
In commending Pitts' work, Griscom, who served as White House communications
director under President Reagan, said Pitts "used what was available to him
to get an answer to a story that we have covered and that has been
important."
Kelly McBride, a member of the ethics faculty at the Poynter Institute for
Media Studies, said she did not fault the reporter for getting help with
asking the question, but described the failure to include that information
with his story as "dishonest with his
readers."
"I suspect some people would see it as manipulative," McBride said. "I
suspect Rumsfeld felt manipulated."
Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita said Rumsfeld gives reporters ample time to
ask questions and that his appearance in Kuwait was for the soldiers.
"Town Hall meetings are intended for soldiers to have dialogue with the
secretary of defense," Di Rita said. "It would be unfortunate to discover
that anyone might have interfered with that opportunity, whatever the
intention."
The reporter's e-mail also indicated Pitts was proud of his role in asking
the question: "I just had one of my best days as a journalist today," he
wrote. He said it "felt good" that the question and answer received so much
attention from other media.
More information about the Media-watch
mailing list